2025年4月11日，歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）發(fā)布消息，歐盟食品安全局發(fā)布關(guān)于沉積型斜發(fā)沸石（clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin）作為所有動(dòng)物飼料添加劑的授權(quán)更新申請(qǐng)的評(píng)估。
經(jīng)過評(píng)估，專家小組得出結(jié)論，該添加劑在授權(quán)使用條件下對(duì)目標(biāo)物種、消費(fèi)者和環(huán)境都是安全的。在授權(quán)更新的情況下，無需評(píng)估添加劑的功效。部分原文報(bào)道如下：
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin as a technological feed additive (binder and anticaking agents) for all animal species. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. The Panel concludes that clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. Regarding user safety, the additive is not a skin nor an eye irritant but should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. Inhalation and dermal exposure are considered a risk. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
經(jīng)過評(píng)估，專家小組得出結(jié)論，該添加劑在授權(quán)使用條件下對(duì)目標(biāo)物種、消費(fèi)者和環(huán)境都是安全的。在授權(quán)更新的情況下，無需評(píng)估添加劑的功效。部分原文報(bào)道如下：
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the assessment of the application for renewal of authorisation of clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin as a technological feed additive (binder and anticaking agents) for all animal species. The applicant provided evidence that the additive currently on the market complies with the existing conditions of authorisation. The Panel concludes that clinoptilolite of sedimentary origin remains safe for all animal species, consumers and the environment under the authorised conditions of use. Regarding user safety, the additive is not a skin nor an eye irritant but should be considered a skin and respiratory sensitiser. Inhalation and dermal exposure are considered a risk. There is no need for assessing the efficacy of the additive in the context of the renewal of the authorisation.
