據歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）消息，11月28日歐盟食品安全局（EFSA）就修訂蔬果、糧食中樂果和氧化樂果的最大殘留限量（MRL）發布意見。
依據歐盟委員會法規（EC）No 396/2005第43條的規定，歐盟食品安全局收到歐盟委員會關于對樂果和氧化樂果最大殘留限量進行優先審查的要求。在此之前，歐盟食品安全局發布了食品中樂果及其代謝物對人體健康影響的風險評估聲明。
在現有數據的基礎上，歐盟食品安全局開展了消費者風險評估，并提議了殘留限量。審查發現，部分監管框架要求下的數據不完善，并且對消費者構成一種急性風險。因此消費者風險評估報告僅作為參考，所有的提議限量需要進一步審查。
部分原文報道如下：
In compliance with Article 43 of Regulation （EC） No 396/2005, EFSA received from the European Commission a mandate to conduct a prioritised review of the existing maximum residue levels （MRL） for dimethoate and omethoate, as a follow up of its 'statement on the assessment of the risk to human health through the pesticide active substance dimethoate and its metabolites in food‘。 based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Some information required by the regulatory framework was missing and a possible acute risk to consumers was identified. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only, all MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers and measures for reduction of the consumer exposure will also need to be considered.
原文鏈接：http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4647/full
日期：2016-11-29
依據歐盟委員會法規（EC）No 396/2005第43條的規定，歐盟食品安全局收到歐盟委員會關于對樂果和氧化樂果最大殘留限量進行優先審查的要求。在此之前，歐盟食品安全局發布了食品中樂果及其代謝物對人體健康影響的風險評估聲明。
在現有數據的基礎上，歐盟食品安全局開展了消費者風險評估，并提議了殘留限量。審查發現，部分監管框架要求下的數據不完善，并且對消費者構成一種急性風險。因此消費者風險評估報告僅作為參考，所有的提議限量需要進一步審查。
部分原文報道如下：
In compliance with Article 43 of Regulation （EC） No 396/2005, EFSA received from the European Commission a mandate to conduct a prioritised review of the existing maximum residue levels （MRL） for dimethoate and omethoate, as a follow up of its 'statement on the assessment of the risk to human health through the pesticide active substance dimethoate and its metabolites in food‘。 based on the assessment of the available data, MRL proposals were derived and a consumer risk assessment was carried out. Some information required by the regulatory framework was missing and a possible acute risk to consumers was identified. Hence, the consumer risk assessment is considered indicative only, all MRL proposals derived by EFSA still require further consideration by risk managers and measures for reduction of the consumer exposure will also need to be considered.
原文鏈接：http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2016.4647/full
日期：2016-11-29
